Home » Fundamental Analysis

Volatility and Risk

15 June 2007 5 Comments

Volatility Definition
In finance, volatility is a statistical measurement of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. If an asset has rapid dramatic price swings, volatility will be high. If prices are consistent and rarely change, volatility is low. Volatility can be measured as the annualized standard deviation.

Volatility as Measure of Risk
Volatility is often used to measure risk. Many common measurements of risk, such as beta, utilize volatility in calculations. It makes sense that an asset that has had huge price swings is more risky than an asset that is not volatile.

Upside vs. Downside Volatility
However, the actual effectiveness of using volatility as a measurement of risk is questionable. The main imperfection of volatility is that it does not differentiate upside and downside price movements. For example, assume a stock decreased in price from $10 to $2. Also assume that the stock exhibited low volatility before this price decrease. In this example, volatility was lower when the stock price was $10 then when the stock price was $2. If volatility was being used a measure of risk in this example, then when the stock priced at $10 it would have been less risky. This assumption is not logical.

Limitations of Predictions
In addition, volatility is a measurement over time that relies on historical data. Past events, however, do not guarantee future results. Using historical volatility as a predictive measure of future risk is thus limited by the uncertainty of future returns. In the financial markets, somewhat unpredictable future returns and radical events are especially prevalent.

Despite imperfections, estimating risks using volatility an important part of risk managements, but the predictive limitations of the measurements needs to be considered.

Famous Quotes About Volatility and Risk

“The true investor welcomes volatility. Ben Graham explained why in Chapter 8 of The Intelligent Investor. There he introduced “Mr. Market,” an obliging fellow who shows up every day to either buy from you or sell to you, whichever you wish. The more manic-depressive this chap is, the greater the opportunities available to the investor. That’s true because a wildly fluctuating market means that irrationally low prices will periodically be attached to solid businesses. It is impossible to see how the availability of such prices can be thought of as increasing the hazards for an investor who is totally free to either ignore the market or exploit its folly.” - 1993 Shareholders Letter by Warren Buffet”Berkshire’s whole record has been achieved without paying one ounce of attention to the efficient market theory in its hard form. And not one ounce of attention to the descendants of that idea, which came out of academic economics and went into corporate finance and morphed into such obscenities as the capital asset pricing model, which we also paid no attention to. I think you’d have to believe in the tooth fairy to believe that you could easily outperform the market by seven-percentage points per annum just by investing in high volatility stocks. Yet many people still believe it. But Berkshire never paid any attention to it.” - Charlie Munger

VIX - The CBOE Volatility Index
VIX, often referred to as the investor fear guage, is the ticker symbol for the Chicago Board Options Exchange(CBOE) Volatility Index. The VIX is based on implied volatility of a wide variety options available on the S&P 500 index and is calculated in real time by the CBOE. This index allows expected volatility to be traded through the use of futures. There are also other variations of the VIX. The VXD tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The VXN tracks the Nadsaq 100 index.

Related Sites:
http://www.tilsonfunds.com/MungerUCSBspeech.pdf
http://www.aetheling.com/MI/Volatility/index.html
http://www.888options.com/classes/volatility/introduction_01.jsp

ShareBuilder-Welcome page

Similar Posts:
Sortino Ratio
Introduction to Financial Derivatives
Sharpe Ratio
International Small Cap ETF Comparison and Analysis
Difference Between Basic Shares Outstanding and Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding

5 Comments »

  • Rob Viglione said:

    What is often lacking in financial models is the incorporation of low probability, but high impact events. A decent read on the topic (although it could do a better job of getting to the point) is the Misbehavior of Markets, by Mandelbrot. Volatility estimates, by virtue of construction with historical data, tend to smooth catastrophic events with normal data. The key to surviving financial catastrophe is to develop rigorous risk management procedures to ensure the bulk of your assets can weather a severe financial storm. The only way to do this is through sufficient diversification, ensuring that your aggregate portfolio contains offsetting correlations that truly minimize beta. This is far trickier than it sounds!

  • Matt said:

    You brought up some very good points Rob. Thanks for the great comment!

  • Max said:

    Please keep these excellent posts coming.

  • Matt (author) said:

    Thanks again for the compliment Max. It has been very interesting to watch the VIX this year, as the markets have been very volatile.

  • mike said:

    The assumption that an asset with large price swings is more risky than an asset that is not volatile is flawed. It may just mean that there is less liquidity in the less volatile asset.

    A house price may be fairly stable over a number of years, but if that price is way above the actual value, buying the house may be more risky than investing in a security for example.

    See this quote below from Warren Buffet’s letter to shareholders.

    “Volatility is not a measure of risk. The people who teach risk in universities do not understand risk. Beta does not measure risk. Warren gave the example of farmland in Nebraska in the early 1980s, which he purchased at $600 an acre. Two years earlier, it was selling for $2000 an acre. However, when farmland was selling at $2000 an acre, its beta was lower. Thus, according to financial theory, farmland was less risky at $2000 an acre than it was at $600 an acre. Volatility as a measure of risk is nonsense.”

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.